Flagship feature · Authority

AI doesn't take your word for it. It checks your receipts.

Before an engine recommends anyone, it weighs the evidence: who vouches for you, who writes for you, what you can prove, and how deep your work runs. Authority scans your entire site and the places machines look for credibility — and turns it into one honest grade you can actually move.

Every pillar built from evidence you can inspect No invented domain scores, no faked reach Mentions checked to be about you, not a same-name stranger
4
Pillars, each with visible receipts
2,000
Pages scanned per full-site pass
Nightly
History, so the grade provably moves

Reads your credibility everywhere machines look for it

Wikipedia
Wikidata
LinkedIn
Crunchbase
G2
Better Business Bureau
Reddit
YouTube
News coverage
X
Facebook
Instagram
TikTok
In short

Authority is the evidence layer of your AI presence: the receipts an engine checks before it recommends anyone. Who vouches for you, who writes for you, what you can prove, how deep your work runs — scanned from your entire site and the public record about you, composed into one grade you can audit at a glance. Brand Intel asks if AI knows you. Reputation asks what it thinks of you. Authority asks why it would believe you.

Receipts shown
Every pillar is built from evidence you can inspect — the actual sources, the actual authors, the actual profiles. Nothing asks to be taken on faith.
Nothing invented
No proprietary "domain rating," no estimated reach, no padded charts. Where there's no data yet, you see that — and that's your to-do list.
About you, proven
Off-site mentions only count when they're actually about you. A same-name stranger's thread never inflates your pillars.
The problem

Engines don't rank the loudest. They cite the credible.

When AI answers "who's the best?", it's running a credibility check you've never seen — across your site, your people, and everything the internet says about you.

Anonymous content loses

Pages with no named human behind them read as noise to systems weighing expertise. Most sites have no idea how much of their money content is unsigned.

Credibility lives off-site

The sources that cite you, the threads that discuss you, the databases that know you exist — engines weigh all of it, and almost nobody watches any of it.

The industry sells fiction

"Domain authority" numbers are invented estimates with no receipts. Chasing a made-up metric feels like progress while the real evidence gaps sit unfixed.

The four pillars

Vouchers. Experts. Credentials. Corpus.

Four kinds of evidence, one honest grade — plus the off-site gravity and trend that show whether it's all moving.

01

Vouchers

Who vouches for you: the real sources AI engines cite when they talk about you, and the genuine links pointing your way. The currency of machine trust — shown, not estimated.

02

Experts

The named humans behind your content — authors, titles, credentials, expertise — and the byline gaps: money pages publishing with nobody's name on them.

03

Credentials

What you can prove: your presence on the platforms machines trust, certifications and licenses found on your pages, the trust signals buyers check — with the missing high-value ones surfaced as wins.

04

Corpus

The depth of your body of work: your entire site scanned — up to 2,000 pages — your newsletter and archives, and whether the machines that matter can actually read any of it.

05

Off-site gravity

Community threads, video reach, news coverage, knowledge-graph presence, and your social footprint — every mention checked to actually be about you before it counts.

06

One grade, trending

A transparent composite of the four pillars with the breakdown always beside it — and nightly history, so when you fix a gap you watch the grade provably move.

No invented numbers

The authority industry sells estimates. We show receipts.

Domain-authority scores are proprietary guesses — a number with no evidence attached, graded by a black box. Authority goes the other way: every claim on your report is something you can click, read, and verify.

How authority tools fake it

  • Sell an invented "domain rating" — an estimate wearing the costume of a measurement.
  • Count any mention with your name in it, including the other company with your name.
  • Show follower counts and reach they never actually measured.
  • Grade you with a black-box formula you can neither audit nor argue with.

How Authority decides

  • Evidence or nothing. Every pillar is built from receipts you can inspect — the actual sources, authors, profiles, and pages. No estimates dressed as data.
  • About you, or not counted. Off-site mentions are checked to actually be about you; the unattributable ones are left out.
  • Unknown reach stays blank. Where a platform won't let reach be measured truthfully, you see nothing — never a made-up number.
  • A grade you can audit. The composite is a transparent read over four visible pillars, breakdown always shown — and history accrues nightly so progress is provable.
Watch it work

Four pillars. Real receipts. One honest grade.

This is an authority scan composing — each pillar charging up from the evidence it found, and the grade stamping only when all four are on the table.

Authority · credibility scan Demo
🏛 Full-site scan · 43 pages read Every pillar shows its receipts
Vouchers82
8 real sources cite you when AI talks about you
Experts44
1 credentialed author found · 12 money pages unsigned
Credentials70
5 verified profiles · 1 license · 2 high-value profiles missing
Corpus84
43 pages · newsletter archive found · fully readable by machines
B
Authority grade70/100 — three pillars established. The breakdown stays right beside the grade, always.
Weakest pillar Experts is dragging the grade — 12 money pages publish with nobody's name on them. The fix list starts there.
70/100
43pages scanned
8sources vouch
1pillar to fix

What one scan hands you.

  • The receipts, pillar by pillar. Who actually cites you, who's actually named on your pages, what's actually claimed — evidence you can click, not estimates.
  • The weakest pillar, called out. The grade tells you where you stand; the breakdown tells you exactly which pillar to fix first and why.
  • The gaps as wins. Unsigned money pages, unclaimed high-value profiles, invisible archives — each one a concrete credibility move engines will notice.
  • Included with every plan. Full-site scan, off-site gravity, the grade, and nightly history — every scan a saved record, so progress is provable.
Compare

Estimated authority vs. evidenced authority.

What you getNot checkingBacklink & DA toolsAuthority
The core question"What's your domain rating?""Why would an AI believe you — and can you show the receipts?"
The number itselfProprietary estimate, black-box formulaTransparent composite of 4 visible pillars, breakdown always shown
Who's behind your contentNamed experts, credentials, and the unsigned-page gaps
AI-era evidenceThe sources AI engines actually cite about you + knowledge-graph presence
Off-site mentionsAnything with your nameCounted only when proven about you
ProgressWatch an estimate wiggleNightly history on evidence that provably moves
CostInvisible credibility gaps$99–400/mo, separate toolIncluded with every plan, all-in
How it works

Scan. Gather. Grade. Build.

1

Scan

Your entire site — up to 2,000 pages — is read for the evidence machines look for: named authors and credentials, verified profiles, certifications, trust pages, archives, and the pages with nobody's name on them.

2

Gather

The public record about you is collected — the sources AI engines cite, community threads, video reach, news coverage, knowledge-graph presence — with every mention checked to actually be about you.

3

Grade

Four pillars — Vouchers, Experts, Credentials, Corpus — compose into one transparent grade. The per-pillar breakdown is always shown beside it. Nothing is a black box; nothing is invented.

4

Build

The weakest pillar becomes the fix list — name the experts, claim the profiles, open the archive, earn the vouchers. History accrues nightly, so the grade provably moves as the work lands.

Glossary

The vocabulary of credibility.

The terms your Authority report uses — defined plainly.

Voucher
A real source that vouches for you — a place AI engines actually cite when they talk about you, or a genuine link pointing your way. The currency of machine trust.
Pillar
One of Authority's four evidence categories — Vouchers, Experts, Credentials, Corpus — each with a stated bar for "established" and a visible strength.
E-E-A-T
Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trust — the qualities search and AI systems look for in the humans and organizations behind content.
Byline gap
A page published with nobody's name on it. To a machine weighing expertise, an unsigned page is a shrug.
Knowledge-graph presence
Whether the structured databases machines consult know you exist — a foundational credibility signal most brands never check.
Authority grade
The transparent composite of the four pillars. The per-pillar breakdown is always shown beside it — it can be audited at a glance, never taken on faith.
FAQ

Questions about Authority.

What is Authority?

Authority is AI Syndicate's credibility monitor — the receipts an AI engine checks before it recommends anyone. It scans your entire site and the places machines look for proof about you, then composes four pillars — Vouchers (who cites you), Experts (who writes for you), Credentials (what you can prove), and Corpus (how deep your work runs) — into one honest grade, with the breakdown always shown and trends accruing over time.

What are the four pillars?

Vouchers — the real sources AI engines cite about you and the links pointing your way. Experts — the named humans behind your content: authors, titles, credentials, and the pages publishing with nobody's name on them. Credentials — what you can prove: verified profiles, certifications and licenses, the trust pages buyers look for. Corpus — the depth of your body of work: your full site, your archive, and whether machines can even read it.

Where does the data come from?

Two places: your own site — scanned in full, up to 2,000 pages — and public data about you across the web: coverage, community threads, video reach, and knowledge-graph presence. Everything is measured from what actually exists; the exact sources and how we weigh them stay ours.

Is this just Domain Rating with a new name?

No — it's closer to the opposite. Domain-authority metrics are invented numbers: proprietary estimates with no receipts attached. Authority never shows you a number it can't back: every pillar is built from evidence you can inspect — the actual sources, the actual authors, the actual profiles — and the grade is a transparent read over those pillars, with the breakdown always beside it.

What happens when there's simply no data about my brand yet?

You see that, honestly. A young brand with no coverage gets empty sections that say so — not padded charts. That's the point: the gaps are the to-do list, and because every scan is saved and history accrues nightly, you watch the pillars fill as the work lands.

How do you avoid counting a same-name brand's mentions as mine?

Every off-site mention is checked to actually be about you before it counts — a thread about someone who happens to share your name doesn't inflate your pillars. When a mention can't be confidently attributed, it's left out. Undercounting honestly beats overcounting flatteringly.

Does Authority track my social following?

Presence, always: which platforms you're actually on, read from your own site. Reach, only where platforms allow it to be measured truthfully — where they don't, you see nothing rather than a made-up follower count. As platforms open up, reach lights up with no work on your side.

Which plans include Authority?

Every plan. The full-site scan, the four pillars, off-site coverage, and the grade are all included — and each scan is a saved record, so your history and trends build automatically with a nightly refresh.

How is Authority different from Brand Intel and Reputation?

Three questions, three features. Brand Intel asks whether AI knows WHO you are. Reputation asks what AI THINKS of you. Authority asks why AI would BELIEVE you — the evidence layer: who vouches for you, who writes for you, what you can prove. Identity, tone, and proof together are how you become the answer.

Find out why AI would believe you — or why it doesn't yet.

Somewhere, an engine just weighed your credibility in milliseconds and moved on. Run a free audit and see the receipts it found — and the ones it didn't.